Ergocure
Ergocure.ai
The Risk Engine

Six risk factors. One configurable engine.

Every ergonomic hazard falls into six families. Each is assessed by validated methods — scored by AI from a phone capture, or camera-free from a structured survey, and signed off by a certified ergonomist. This is the full library; methods light up as each is productised.

Live now Coming Camera Text (no camera) Sensor
Request a Pilot
Full-body musculoskeletal view with joint measurement markers — the risk engine scores ergonomic load across every major joint

Compare the 11 live frameworks

Each validated method scores a different kind of ergonomic load. What each one measures, the body region it covers, its score range, and when to reach for it.

Comparison of Ergocure's 11 live ergonomic assessment methods — what each scores, the body region it covers, its score range, and when to use it.
MethodWhat it scoresBody regionScore rangeBest for
REBA
Rapid Entire Body Assessment
Whole-body posture + loadNeck, trunk, legs, armsREBA score 1–15Varied, dynamic tasks — patient handling, assembly
RULA
Rapid Upper Limb Assessment
Upper-limb postureNeck, trunk, arms, wristsRULA grand score 1–7Seated, screen-intensive desk work
ROSA
Rapid Office Strain Assessment
Office workstation fitChair, monitor, keyboard, mouse, phoneROSA grand score 1–10 (score > 5 = high risk)Office / DSE screen workstations
NIOSH
NIOSH Lifting Equation (Revised, 1994)
Manual lifting limit (Lifting Index)Whole-body lift mechanicsLifting Index (LI = Load ÷ RWL); RWL baseline 23 kgTwo-handed manual lifting tasks
OCRA
Occupational Repetitive Actions (Checklist)
Repetitive upper-limb exposureShoulders, elbows, wrists, handsOCRA Checklist Index (OCLI)Repetitive cyclic tasks across a shift
JSI
Job Strain Index
Hand / wrist exertion intensityHand, wrist, forearmStrain Index (SI) — continuousWrist-intensive, forceful repetitive tasks
OWAS
Ovako Working Posture Analysis System
Whole-shift working postureBack, arms, legs + loadAction Category 1–4 per posture codeIndustrial postures sampled across a shift
LUBA
Loading on the Upper Body Assessment
Joint-load posture severity (LUBA)Neck, trunk, shoulder, elbow, wristComposite Index → 4 action categoriesSustained awkward postures where joint-angle severity matters
MMC-ISO
Manual Material Handling (ISO 11228-1)
Manual lifting limit — ISO 11228-1Whole-body lift mechanicsLifting Index (LI) / simplified Annex tablesISO-aligned manual lifting assessment
Liberty Mutual
Manual Handling Tables (Snook)
Manual-handling acceptability (Snook)Lift, lower, push, pull, carryPopulation acceptability (% of workers)Population-based push / pull / carry limits
RPA
Rapid Posture Assessment
Rapid posture screen (EPR)Whole-body static postureEPR index 0–10 → 5 action levelsFast first-pass posture screening

All scores are computed automatically from a phone capture (or a camera-free survey) and validated by a certified ergonomist before any worker sees them.

The six risk factors, and the methods that score them

Every ergonomic hazard falls into one of six families. Each is assessed by one or more validated methods — live now, or on the roadmap as the library is productised.

The six ergonomic risk factors mapped to the validated assessment methods that score each one.
Risk factorWhat it coversAssessed by
PosturesHow the body is held while working — sitting, standing, bending, twisting, reaching.RULAROSAREBAOWASLUBARPA+2 on roadmap
LoadsManual handling of weight — lifting, lowering, carrying.NIOSHLiberty MutualMMC-ISO
ForcesEffort exerted — gripping, pushing, pulling, sustained tension.JSIREBA (force)+1 on roadmap
RepetitionHow often the same movement is repeated — cycle times and task frequency.OCRAJSI
EnvironmentThe physical conditions around the work — lighting, noise, temperature, vibration, air.CVS-Q+5 on roadmap
Global & PsychosocialWhole-job factors — workload, stress, autonomy, shift patterns, and reported discomfort.NASA-TLXWOSNMQ+4 on roadmap
Risk factor 01

Postures

How the body is held while working — sitting, standing, bending, twisting, reaching.

Driven by: Poorly set-up workstations, sustained static positions, and tasks that force awkward joint angles.

Leads to: Neck, shoulder, back and wrist musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) — the leading driver of desk-work discomfort and presenteeism.

What we measure

  • Anatomical-neutral deviation: Exact joint angles measured against clinical thresholds to flag high-risk positioning.
  • Static-position tracking: Duration of uncorrected fixed postures that restrict blood flow and stiffen muscle.
  • Multi-axial spinal twisting: Simultaneous bending and twisting that compromises spinal-disc integrity.
Risk factor 02

Loads

Manual handling of weight — lifting, lowering, carrying.

Driven by: Heavy or awkwardly-placed loads, high lifting frequency, and poor lifting geometry.

Leads to: Lumbar (lower-back) injury — the single costliest manual-handling claim.

What we measure

  • Weight-threshold mapping: Object weight benchmarked against safe guidelines to prevent overexertion.
  • Asymmetrical-distribution analysis: Load handled away from the core, increasing spinal shear stress.
  • Vertical & horizontal travel: Distance a load is lifted or carried, driving fatigue on major joints.
Risk factor 03

Forces

Effort exerted — gripping, pushing, pulling, sustained tension.

Driven by: High grip force, heavy tools, and forceful exertions during tool and equipment use.

Leads to: Tendon and soft-tissue disorders in the hand, wrist and forearm.

What we measure

  • Grip & pinch-pressure tracking: Localised force in the hands and fingers during tool or material handling.
  • Push-pull resistance modelling: Forces required to start or sustain movement of carts, machinery, or assets.
  • Sustained-muscle-tension logs: Periods of continuous isometric contraction that accelerate fatigue.
Risk factor 04

Repetition

How often the same movement is repeated — cycle times and task frequency.

Driven by: Short-cycle repetitive work — assembly, typing, scanning, packing — with too little recovery.

Leads to: Cumulative-trauma disorders such as tendinitis and carpal tunnel syndrome.

What we measure

  • Cycle-time frequency: Duration of repeated sequences, flagging ultra-short, high-frequency actions.
  • Tissue-recovery allocation: Ratio of active exertion to structured rest within each movement cycle.
  • Cumulative daily motions: Total repetitive movements aggregated across the full shift.
Risk factor 05

Environment

The physical conditions around the work — lighting, noise, temperature, vibration, air.

Driven by: Poor lighting and glare, excess noise, thermal discomfort, and tool/vehicle vibration.

Leads to: Eye strain, fatigue, hearing risk, and hand-arm or whole-body vibration disorders.

What we measure

  • Thermal-stress audits: Heat or cold levels and their effect on muscular flexibility and dexterity.
  • Vibration-exposure logs: Hand-arm or whole-body vibration from tools and machinery.
  • Visual ergonomics & glare: Lighting, contrast, and reflections that trigger posture adjustments or eye strain.
CVS-Q Live
Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire

Screens for digital eye strain — dryness, blur and visual fatigue from screen work.

TextDetails
FANGER PMV/PPDComing
Thermal comfort model

Predicts thermal comfort/discomfort from temperature, humidity, airflow and clothing.

Sensor Text
ISO 2631Coming
Whole-body vibration (ISO)

Measures whole-body vibration exposure from vehicles and platforms.

Sensor
ISO 5349Coming
Hand-arm vibration (ISO)

Measures hand-arm vibration from power tools.

Sensor
LESTComing
Work-condition evaluation

Evaluates the work environment and organisation, including mental load.

Text
ECLComing
Ergonomic Checkpoints (ILO)

A practical checklist across workstation, environment and tools.

Text
Risk factor 06

Global & Psychosocial

Whole-job factors — workload, stress, autonomy, shift patterns, and reported discomfort.

Driven by: Excessive pace and overtime, low control, weak support, and unmanaged fatigue.

Leads to: Stress, burnout, and the early-warning discomfort that precedes a reportable MSD.

What we measure

  • Cognitive-workload indexing: Mental fatigue and frustration during complex or high-pressure intervals.
  • Shift-pattern sustainability: Impact of irregular hours and rapid rotations on natural recovery cycles.
  • Discomfort-symptom mapping: Anonymous self-reported strain matched to objective floor risks.
LESTComing
Work-condition evaluation

Evaluates work pace, mental load and organisation alongside the environment.

Text
NASA-TLX Live
Task Load Index

Self-report of mental workload across six dimensions.

TextDetails
WOS Live
Work Organization Survey

Self-report of work pace, organisation and demand factors that drive strain.

TextDetails
COPSOQComing
Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire

Surveys psychosocial risk — demands, influence, support, stress.

Text
JCQComing
Job Content Questionnaire

Measures job demand, control and support.

Text
NMQ Live
Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire

Maps where workers feel musculoskeletal discomfort — the standard discomfort survey.

Text
CornellComing
Cornell MSD Questionnaire

A detailed body-map discomfort survey.

Text
In their words

Relief that shows up fast

Real outcomes employees reported after their assessment — anonymised.

I started getting relief from pain by day one.
Employee, global investment bank
Her advice has helped me manage my chronic back pain and perform better at work.
Employee, global investment bank
The footrest she suggested helped my chronic tailbone and back pain to a great extent.
Employee, global investment bank

Not sure which methods apply to you?

Tell us your industry and region — we'll map the risk factors, the methods, and the compliance that applies.